Understanding how dark patterns continue to manipulate consumers and gig workers even after companies claim compliance revealing the transparency gaps that remain.
Table of Contents
Dark patterns are sneaky design tricks that online platforms use to deceive users into making choices they never intended to make. Despite company claims of fixing these problems, they remain widespread and harmful to both everyday shoppers and gig economy workers. This article explores what dark patterns are, how they manipulate people into spending more money or earning less, and why true transparency is still missing from many digital platforms.
What Are Dark Patterns?
Dark patterns are deceptive user interface designs built into websites and mobile apps to manipulate your behavior. Rather than helping you make informed decisions, these designs nudge you toward actions that benefit the company at your expense. A simple shopping experience becomes a maze of hidden fees, confusing options, and guilt-inducing messages that push you in unwanted directions.
India was the first country globally to issue dedicated guidelines against dark patterns through the Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns, 2023. These guidelines identify 13 specific types of dark patterns that companies are prohibited from using. The United States Federal Trade Commission found that over 76 percent of websites examined used at least one dark pattern, while nearly 67 percent used multiple patterns together.
Common Dark Patterns That Trick You Into Paying More
Several dark patterns affect consumer wallets directly. Drip pricing is perhaps the most common. A clothing website shows you a jacket for 500 rupees, but by the time you reach checkout, delivery fees, service charges, and taxes have added another 300 rupees to your bill. The initial price seemed attractive, but the final cost shocked you. You already invested time browsing and filling details, making it harder to abandon your purchase.
Basket sneaking happens when platforms automatically add items to your shopping cart without permission. You select one item, proceed to checkout, and discover a paid protection plan, gift wrapping service, or charitable donation has been silently added. You must actively uncheck these boxes to remove them, and many customers miss these additions entirely. BookMyShow faced regulatory action in India for automatically adding one rupee per ticket as a contribution to BookASmile without asking customers first.
Confirm shaming uses guilt and fear to pressure you into choices. Instead of a simple “decline” button, you see messages like “No, I will take the risk” or “No, I hate saving money.” These shame-based messages manipulate your emotions into accepting offers you wanted to refuse. Indigo Airlines was penalized for using such tactics when offering baggage insurance options at checkout.
The roach motel pattern makes signing up for services easy but canceling them extremely difficult. Companies design simple one-click subscription buttons but hide cancellation options behind complicated multi-step processes. You might need to log in, navigate through multiple menus, find buried settings, or even contact customer service to cancel. This friction keeps many trapped subscribers who give up rather than navigate the process.
How Gig Workers Face Hidden Earnings Traps
Gig workers experience dark patterns in a different but equally damaging way. Delivery drivers, ride-hailing workers, and freelancers often cannot see how much money they will earn before accepting a job. This opacity prevents them from making informed choices about which jobs suit their needs and time.
Research by Human Rights Watch found that all major gig platforms except Amazon Flex use opaque, constantly changing algorithms to calculate worker pay. When researchers asked these companies to explain how pay is determined, most companies refused to share that information. This secrecy means workers have no way to understand whether they are being treated fairly or discriminated against based on invisible factors.
A product manager who previously worked as a gig worker for Instacart and Shipt described how app designs actively hide critical information from workers. The apps calculate earnings but do not clearly show the distance to the pickup location or the distance a worker must drive to return home. Workers must mentally calculate these expenses, often underestimating true costs. A delivery that appears to pay 300 rupees might actually cost 150 rupees in fuel and vehicle wear and tear, leaving workers with far less than they thought.
Gig platforms also use psychological tricks to push workers to accept lower paying jobs. They display urgency messages suggesting orders are disappearing, pressure workers to maintain high acceptance rates through rating systems, and make it difficult to see alternative job opportunities that might pay more. Some workers report that their access to higher paying jobs mysteriously disappears if they reject too many low paying assignments, creating a system of invisible punishment.
The Transparency Illusion: Why Company Declarations Fall Short
In November 2025, the Indian government announced that 26 major e-commerce and quick commerce platforms, including Zomato, Flipkart, Swiggy, and BigBasket, had self-declared themselves free from dark patterns. These companies claimed to have completed internal or third-party audits and removed all manipulative practices.
This announcement sounds positive but masks a critical gap. Self-audits rely on companies policing themselves without external verification or enforcement. The government’s advisory to platforms was non-binding, with no penalties specified for non-compliance and no independent audit mechanism. Companies could submit declarations knowing regulatory enforcement was limited. Research shows that even after such declarations, problematic practices often persist.
The UK and European approach differs significantly. Regulators conduct active investigations and impose substantial fines. In 2023, Ireland’s Data Protection Commission fined TikTok 345 million euros for using dark patterns to manipulate minors into making their accounts public. This concrete enforcement changes platform behavior in ways that voluntary declarations never do.
The Gaps That Remain
Several transparency problems continue despite regulatory efforts. First, algorithm opacity persists. Gig platforms still refuse to disclose how they calculate pay, allocate work, or determine which workers see which jobs. Even with transparency requirements, companies hide behind technical complexity and claims of proprietary algorithms.
Second, disclosure timing matters but remains problematic. Some platforms show full pricing only at the final checkout stage. By then, users have invested effort and psychological commitment, making them less likely to abandon their purchases. Experts argue that all costs must be disclosed at the earliest point in the user journey, not hidden until the last moment.
Third, enforcement mechanisms remain weak in many jurisdictions. The United States Federal Trade Commission has fined companies like Epic Games (Fortnite) 245 million dollars for dark patterns, but these fines are rare and target only the most egregious cases. Most dark patterns continue without consequence.
Fourth, gig workers lack meaningful information control. Unlike consumers who can choose not to purchase, gig workers must engage with platforms to earn income. The power imbalance means even transparent platforms might present information in ways that subtly push workers toward platform preferences.
How Researchers and Startups Are Fighting Back
Academic researchers have developed methods to systematically identify dark patterns. Some use computer vision combined with artificial intelligence to analyze website screenshots, comparing them against known dark pattern templates. These automated tools can review thousands of screenshots in minutes, identifying visual tricks like misleading button placements, confusing color contrasts, and mismatched text sizes.
Natural language processing helps detect dark patterns in text. Guilt-inducing language in buttons, fake urgency in countdown timers, and misleading claims in descriptions can be flagged automatically. This technology enables large-scale detection that human reviewers cannot achieve.
Startups like Fair Patterns have built screening tools specifically designed to detect dark patterns before they cause harm. These tools help companies avoid regulatory penalties while providing transparency insights. As regulations tighten globally, AI-powered detection tools are becoming essential for compliance programs.
However, significant barriers remain. Many companies resist adopting detection technologies because their business models depend on manipulative designs generating extra revenue. The short-term profits from dark patterns often outweigh regulatory risks in companies’ calculations. Until enforcement becomes consistent and penalties substantial, many platforms will continue deploying these deceptive practices.
What Real Transparency Requires
True transparency in digital platforms requires several changes. Payment structures must be fully disclosed upfront, not dripped through checkout stages. For gig workers, this means showing total estimated earnings, distance to job locations, and return trip requirements before workers accept assignments.
Regulatory enforcement must move beyond voluntary guidelines. Governments should establish audit mechanisms with actual penalties for violations. The European Union and United Kingdom demonstrate that enforcement actions create incentives for compliance far more effectively than company self-audits.
Platform design should prioritize user autonomy. Making cancellation as easy as signup, defaulting to options that benefit users rather than companies, and eliminating guilt-based language are basic steps toward ethical design.
For gig workers specifically, algorithm transparency is non-negotiable. Workers deserve to understand how their pay is calculated, why they receive certain jobs, and what factors influence their algorithmic standing. Without this information, workers cannot advocate for fair treatment or detect discrimination.
Consumers and workers also have power. Awareness of dark patterns helps people recognize manipulation in real time. Asking platform companies direct questions about their practices, supporting regulatory efforts, and choosing platforms with transparent policies creates market pressure for change.
Dark patterns persist because they work. They manipulate human psychology in ways that benefit companies while harming users. Despite recent regulatory attention and company declarations of compliance, meaningful transparency remains elusive. Real change requires consistent enforcement, technological innovation, and collective demand for ethical design practices from both consumers and workers.
Conclusion
Dark patterns remain a stubborn problem because they’re built into the business models of many platforms. Even when companies claim compliance, the lack of independent audits and weak enforcement allows manipulative design to continue shaping user behavior. Consumers still face hidden fees and misleading prompts, while gig workers deal with opaque algorithms that affect their earnings and opportunities. Real progress requires more than voluntary declarations. It calls for stronger rules, outside verification, and meaningful penalties when companies cross the line. It also demands clearer information for both shoppers and workers so they can make decisions without being pushed or misled. Growing efforts from researchers, regulators, and ethical design advocates show that change is possible, but it will only happen when transparency becomes a requirement rather than a corporate promise.
Source: Gig Economy in India: How the Indian Gig Economy Is Becoming a Million-Dollar Industry & The Gig Worker’s Hidden Costs: Making Gig Apps Work for Drivers Too
Read Also: Personal Data Protection: A Beginner’s Guide to Staying Safe Online & Digital Literacy in Rural India: How Skills, Access, and Local Opportunities Are Shaping the Future
